Future of Scotland – the Smith Commission #pisky #Anglican

IMG_0323-0.JPG

I’ve just been to the launch of the Report of the Smith Commission – setting out the agreement reached by Scotland’s political parties and politicians at Westminster on further devolution for the Scottish Parliament,

Why was I there? We were given the opportunity of making a submission to the Commission – which we did. It’s part of our commitment to being part of public discourse in Scotland. I was interested to find many representatives of the voluntary, social and community sectors also in attendance. So I was able to make some useful contacts.

And the outcome? It’s impressive that this agreement has been reached in five weeks. Where I come from they would still be arguing about the shape of the table. It’s a substantial agreement which will greatly enhance the status and authority of the Scottish Parliament.

Most impressive was the way the Scottish politicians spoke – warm tributes to Lord Smith of Kelvin and strong endorsement of the agreement reached. Yet they were not afraid also to say what they would have liked to see in the agreement and didn’t get.

That’s mature politics and to be celebrated.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Future of Scotland – the Smith Commission #pisky #Anglican

  1. Jimmy says:

    I read this today –
    “The Smith Commission recommendations give Scotland significant power to spend money, but no power to create the money in order to spend it.”

    It has also been estimated that it would have taken Robert Smith
    literally years to read all the submissions.
    Which made the consultative process more of a puplic relations exercise.

  2. Dan O'Connor says:

    Jimmy, no need for cynicism about the consultative process, Robert Smith had a splendid team working with him – witness the highly-skilled and informed woman at his right hand during the televised sessions.

  3. Pingback: Scottish Episcopal Church News for January 2015 - What is in Kelvin's Head?

Comments are closed.